What is on the other side, of what we call a black 'hole'?

Man has been challenged, confronted, disputed on this very abnormal type of endless hole...Black Hole

So we know, that most scientists have either given these two theories as mentioned

1. Is that it's a large spiral hole, endless, and if you get in, there's no getting out, you get to a state of limbo, you're stuck in what's called the 4th dimension.  Or even nothing! Stuck in nothing! That's hard to say, because you're basically spaghettified, stretched to a state where your ear bone is 30 times the size of your body.
2. Or you get in, chucked in, chucked out. Get in to a black hole which sucks everything, a hole in the balloon, and get out from the other side of the balloon, throwing, literally flinging on everything at an un-imaginable speed. Again, you would be huge, spaghettified, and you wouldn't be here to say.

Both sound bad, gory, stretchy, elongated and sounds really a bad state, and in both situations, you're dead and spaghettified.

But I feel that there is a bug, a bad bug in both the theories:

Why spaghettified?

If it's gravity, then it should take you whole! If something, at least using basic earth physics, has to be stretched, then there has to be resistive force, and opposing force, or something where forces are not acting in the same direction. In the earth, if I jump up, air pressure and gravity push and pull you down, but I guess I will certainly not extended in any case. As a fact, astronauts actually get lengthened in zero gravity!

If a black hole has to pull us in, than it'll take us whole, full and in one piece of a non-exponential size, as gravity does usually.

If gravity is TOO strong, it'll suck us faster! Quite simple!

And as mentioned in the first theory, it's quite weird to get stuck in 'nothing'!

If an object had to move somewhere, it needs space, and if there isn't anything (better known nothing), how is it that nothing going to take something?  Space could even be called as something, proved, as some of the telescopes can see the ends of the universe, which we can implies that universe definitely has a definite shape, or it at least has ends. If there is no something, it can't take anything, and that certainly can't back the first theory.

These two so-called 'bugs' in the theories of such illustrious, imaginative and creative, intelligent scientists seriously don't apply to really, really basic physics, laws which we don't need to be taught, laws which someone doesn't have to be literate for.

Now coming to the other side of the black hole, it's either nothing or a prick in the universe balloon, leading us out.  If it is a prick like in a balloon, maybe that's how the universe is expanding, space is actually been blown out, it's actually like how air does in terms of a normal earth rubber balloon.
There might be millions of black holes, everywhere, which we don't know of, through which space leaks out. Space might be infinite, it could just keep expanding, even into nothingness.
Space is endless, it doesn't have borders.

Plunge into this my readers! It's endless, the study of this.

I really liked the movie Interstellar, it is all about black holes, time parodies and all those really weird phenomenons when you get near a black hole! I suggest you to watch this movie!

To proceed to Part 2, click here.